Neuberger & Partners LLP named 2026 Boutique Law Firm of the Year by the Canadian Law Awards. See the award →
× HomeOur Services  About Us  Recent SuccessesTestimonialsNews & Videos  Contactفارسی中文
Contact Our Firm

HIGHLY EXPERIENCED AND SKILLED TORONTO

Criminal Defence Law Firm

With over three decades of experience, our firm is adept at providing high-quality, serious representation for criminal charges, including a specialization in sexual assault and domestic-related offences.

 

Contact Our Firm
2026-27 Top Criminal Law Boutique Top 25 Most Influential Lawyers 2025 Best Law Firms National Tier 1 2026 Boutique Law Firm of the Year

Book a Consultation Now

The criminal justice system can be daunting, but you don’t need to go through it alone. Our Criminal Lawyers are here to guide you every step of the way.

Meticulous Defence

BACKED BY A COLLABORATIVE TEAM APPROACH

Led by our founder, Joseph Neuberger, our team of criminal lawyers and legal professionals has built a solid reputation with colleagues and clients. We are a criminal defence law firm with mastery in devising comprehensive, creative and effective defence strategies.

Our approach has been crafted over years of dedicated practice and continuous enhancement of our knowledge base and skills. We apply incisive factual analysis, deep legal insight, the support of complementary experts and an in-house team approach to generating customized, high-quality solutions for criminal cases of all kinds — with particular specialization in defending against sexual and domestic assault-related allegations.

Neuberger & Partners Sexual Assault Law Updates

 

Read Newsletters

Criminal Law

Over Three Decades Of Practice

Founded in 1993, Neuberger & Partners LLP is a high profile Toronto law firm with exclusive focus on criminal law. Our lawyers have represented clients in simple, complex and high-profile cases throughout the Greater Toronto Area and across Ontario.

 

About Us

 

Neuberger and Partners LLP Canadian Law Awards 2026 Certificate - Boutique Law Firm of the Year Excellence Awardee

Award-Winning Excellence

2026 Boutique Law Firm of the Year

Neuberger & Partners LLP has been named an Excellence Awardee at the 2026 Canadian Law Awards, presented by Lexpert — recognizing our firm’s dedication to outstanding criminal defence advocacy across Ontario.

View Award Profile

Practice Areas

Sex Crimes & Domestic Offences

Sexual assault cases are as varied on issues as there are cases in the system. These cases can be based on historical allegations, allegations arising from domestic or intrapersonal relations (dating, office, etc.), or can arise from misidentification…

Read More

 

 

Violent Offences

Violent crimes defence, particularly for crimes involving assault, demands the attention of experienced and highly capable lawyers who understand how to fully prepare a case for trial. With potential penalties that can include fines, court-ordered…

Read More

 

 

Impaired & Other Driving Offences

Within our practice, we defend a significant number of cases of impaired driving and over 80 charges. At Neuberger & Partners LLP, we have a very high success rate.* When charged with a driving-related offence, it is crucial to obtain prompt…

Read More

 

Drug Charges

Drug Charges range from less serious ones like marijuana possession to much more serious drug charges, such as possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking, importing and exporting drugs, marijuana grow ops, and trafficking drugs…

Read More

 

 

Property & Theft Charges

Offences involving theft, possession of stolen property, proceeds of crimes, fraud, breach of trust, mischief to property and data, and other related offences demand meticulous and detailed analysis of evidence and available defences…

Read More

 

 

Fraud & Financial Charges

At Neuberger & Partners LLP, we are experienced in working alongside corporate and civil lawyers in protecting the interests of business clients accused of fraud, breach of trust and theft. As an experienced and highly-skilled criminal…

Read More

 

General Criminal Defence

In 2018, more than 2.2 million crimes and violations were committed across Canada. The types of crimes committed varied, as there are seemingly countless crimes an individual could be charged with. In addition to the Criminal Code…

Read More

 

 

Extradition

Neuberger & Partners LLP is a highly-skilled criminal law firm serving the Greater Toronto Area and nearby Ontario communities with experience with high-profile extradition cases. Our Toronto extradition lawyers have the experience…

Read More

 

 

Professional Discipline

Individuals in regulated occupations invest significant resources into qualifying and practising their profession. Society rightly holds them to a high standard of conduct. Any allegation of misconduct could lead to…

Read More

 

Internet Based Offences

Internet-based offences, such as luring, communicating to obtain sexual services for consideration, human trafficking, cyberstalking, child pornography, and criminal harassment, are becoming far more prevalent as the use of…

Read More

 

JOSEPH NEUBERGER

Certified Specialist in Criminal Law

To be recognized in Ontario by the Law Society of Ontario as a certified specialist in criminal law is unique. With a Master’s Degree of Law and as a published author, Joseph Neuberger leverages more than three decades of expertise to build a highly-regarded criminal defence firm with a proven track record of success.

Read More About Joseph

 

To be recognized in Ontario by the Law Society of Ontario as a certified specialist in criminal law is unique. With a Master’s Degree of Law and as a published author, Joseph Neuberger leverages more than three decades of expertise to build a highly-regarded criminal defence firm with a proven track record of success.

Success Stories

Rex v. M.F. (2026)

<p> M.F. found not guilty following a trial on charges of Sexual Assault, Sexual Interference, and Invitation to Sexual Touching in the Ontario Court of Justice, Brampton. M.F.’s daughter, the complainant, alleged...

Read More

Rex v G.D. (2026)

<p> G.D. was charged under the Dog Owner Liability Act because of a tragic incident in which the family dog escaped from the back yard and attacked a pedestrian. Despite the fact there was a lawsuit in which the victim...

Read More

Rex v. S.H. (2026)

<p> Charges of Falsify and Furnish False Information contrary to the Motor Vehicle Dealers Act against S.H. stayed due to unreasonable delay pursuant to Section 11(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the...

Read More

Rex v B.J. (2026)

<p> B.J. retained Ms. Condello to defend him on six charges of Criminal Mischief damage to property for writing in permanent ink at a bus station.  The client saw graffiti of a swastika and wrote next it “Jesus is...

Read More

Rex v. Z.K. (2026)

<p> Charge of Fail to Comply with Probation against Z.K. withdrawn in the Ontario Court of Justice, Newmarket.   Z.K. was charged with failing to comply with his probation order which prohibited him from having contact...

Read More

R v M.K. (2026)

<p> The client retained Grace Condello to represent him on a charge of Careless driving causing the death of a pedestrian.  A pedestrian was struck at an intersection at an expressway in the late evening.  The driver was...

Read More

Rex v. A.A. (2026)

<p> Client found not guilty of second-degree murder but guilty of lesser and included offence of Manslaughter. A.A. was accused of searching for his sister’s estranged husband and located him at his aunt’s...

Read More

Rex v. N.B. (2026)

<p> Charges of Human Trafficking withdrawn against N.B. in the Ontario Court of Justice, Brampton. N.B. and I.B. were alleged to be involved in the trafficking of sex trade workers. In July of 2024, the complainant was at...

Read More

Rex v. N.B. (2026)

<p> Client found factually innocent of Sexual Assault x 2 and Assault x 3 after four-day trial, London Superior Court.  N.B. and his girlfriend started dating before she joined him at university.  Shortly after the start...

Read More

R. S.Y. (2026)

<p> Client found not guilty after trial, Newmarket on three counts of fail to comply.  SY was charged with three counts of failure to comply with his release order. It was alleged that SY through his father-in-law...

Read More

Rex v. R.M. (2026)

<p> Charges of Sexual Assault and Assault Choking, withdrawn on eve of trial.  R.M. and his wife were in the midst of a deteriorating marriage.  The complainant left Canada with their one son to her home country.  The...

Read More

R. v. T. X. (2026)

<p> T.X. was charged with three counts of Sexual Assault out of Newmarket courthouse. He was a manager at a restaurant where the complainant was an employee. The complainant alleged that when she turned 18, T.X. started...

Read More

Our Criminal Lawyers are here to guide you every step of the way.

 

Book a Consultation Now

Why Our Clients Win

When it comes to the trial, it is our general position that clients must testify at trial. This is particularly important when facing allegations of domestic assault, or sexual assault. The evidence of the client at trial is vital to laying out the defence narrative and giving the court the opportunity to hear and see the client give his or her evidence and refute the allegations. Because of case law there is a very structured framework for judges and juries to assess the evidence of the accused. Reported cases like R. v. W.(D.) and articles such as “Doubt about Doubt” by respected jurists, there is a very structured framework for judges and juries to assess the evidence of the accused. If the client does not testify, then the judge or jury will only have one version of events and cross-examination to raise inconsistencies or implausible aspects of the prosecution case; this may not always be sufficient to raise a reasonable doubt. A court needs to carefully assess the evidence.

If the client does not testify, then the judge or jury will only have one version of events and cross-examination to raise inconsistencies or implausible aspects of the prosecution case, it not always sufficient. We strongly recommend clients to testify and have been extremely successful in winning cases, including clients being found factually innocent at trial.

Do I have to testify at my own trial?

No. In Canada, as a general proposition an accused person has an absolute right not to testify. Section 11(c) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects you from being compelled to be a witness against yourself, and the presumption of innocence (section 11(d)) means the Crown must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt whether or not you say a word. The Crown cannot call you as a witness, and in a jury trial, neither the judge nor the prosecutor may suggest to the jury that your silence points to guilt (section 4(6) of the Canada Evidence Act).


If I don’t have to testify, why might it be important to do so?

Even though the burden of proof always rests on the Crown, there are situations where we strongly advise that your own testimony can be the most important evidence in the case:

  • Some defences depend on your version of events. Defences like self-defence, honest but mistaken belief, duress, or lack of intent often turn on what you perceived, believed, or intended at the time. In many cases, you are the only person who can put that evidence before the court. Without your testimony, there may simply be no evidentiary foundation for the defence. That is why a judge needs to hear from you.
  • Credibility contests. In cases that come down to one person’s word against another’s — common in assault, sexual assault, and threats cases — a trier of fact who hears only the complainant’s account may find it more difficult to have a reasonable doubt. When an accused testifies, the court applies the framework from R. v. W.(D.): if the judge or jury believes your evidence, or is left in reasonable doubt by it, you must be acquitted. Your testimony gives the court a direct path to that doubt.
  • Explaining suspicious circumstances. If the Crown’s case includes evidence that looks incriminating — your fingerprints at a scene, your presence nearby, text messages, possession of an item — an innocent explanation often has to come from you. Silence leaves the Crown’s interpretation as the only narrative the court hears.
  • Alibi evidence. If your defence is that you were somewhere else, your own testimony is frequently central to establishing the alibi, usually alongside other witnesses or records.
  • Humanizing yourself. Judges and juries decide cases on evidence, but hearing directly from an accused can counter a one-dimensional picture painted by the Crown’s witnesses.

Does that mean testifying is always the right choice?

It depends — and this is a critical point. Testifying carries real risks, and experienced defence lawyers sometimes advise clients not to testify, particularly when the Crown’s case is weak. Reasons an accused might stay silent include:

  • Cross-examination. The Crown gets to question you, and a skilled prosecutor may expose inconsistencies, gaps in memory, or a demeanour that hurts your credibility, even if you are telling the truth.
  • Your criminal record may come in. Under section 12 of the Canada Evidence Act, an accused who testifies can generally be cross-examined on prior convictions to challenge credibility, unless the judge limits this after a Corbett application.
  • Filling gaps in the Crown’s case. Your answers might inadvertently supply details or admissions the Crown could not otherwise prove.
  • A weak Crown case may not need answering. If the prosecution’s evidence is already full of holes created by our cross-examination, testifying can only introduce new risk.

Who decides whether I testify?

The decision belongs to you, the accused. It is one of the few fundamental decisions in a criminal case (along with how to plead and the mode of trial) that counsel cannot make for you. Your lawyer’s role is to give you frank advice about the strength of the Crown’s case, the risks of cross-examination, and whether your defence realistically requires your evidence. Generally speaking though, we recommend that our clients testify so that a judge has a complete picture of the defence.


When during the trial is this decision made?

Typically the defence decides after the Crown closes its case. At that point, your lawyer can assess how strong the prosecution’s evidence actually turned out to be. If the Crown’s case is weak, the defence may call no evidence at all. If a defence needs your account to get off the ground, testifying may be essential. We will typically proceed on the basis that you will be testifying and, as result, spend considerable time preparing you for this. If for some reason, the Crown’s case “falls apart” before the defence is called, we will assess the pros and cons of having you testify.


Can a jury in a judge and jury trial hold it against me if I don’t testify?

The judge and Crown are prohibited from commenting to the jury on your failure to testify. That said, as a practical reality, in cases that hinge on competing accounts, a trier of fact hears only one side of the story if you remain silent. This practical dynamic — rather than any legal inference — is a large part of why testifying can matter so much in certain cases.


What should I do if I’m facing this decision?

Our many years of experience will guide you to make your decision. The right choice depends entirely on the specifics: the nature of the charge, the strength of the Crown’s evidence, whether your defence requires your account, your criminal record, and how you are likely to hold up under cross-examination.

Media Appearances

 Learn why so many defendants choose Neuberger and Partners to defend their cases, take a look at this video from Joseph Neuberger as he explains the importance of a team approach.

If you or a loved one need a strong legal defence, please give us a call at 416-364-3111.

 

 Hoggard did not have position of power over complainants in sex assault trial: judge

 

 

 Male Stereotypes In The Trial Process

 

 

 Team Approach to Defending Cases

 

 

 Defending Domestic Abuse Charges

 

 

 Capacity to Consent in Sexual Assault Cases

 

 

 In The Media Dedicated to Defending our Clients

 

 

 Joseph Neuberger On The Mike Duffy Trial

 

 

 Toronto Officer Guilty of Attempted Murder in Sammy Yatim

 

Billiards with the Bar – 2026

Joseph Neuberger, along with Neuberger & Partners LLP, is pleased to announce their hosting of the 10th annual Billiards with the Bar – 2026. Proceeds will go towards the Toronto Lawyers Feed the Hungry Program in achieving its mandate of providing meals to those in need. The fundraiser will take place on November 26th, 2026 – 6:30 pm, at the VIP Billiards Club, 842 College Street, Toronto, ON M6H 1A2.
.

Donate Now

 

“Toronto Lawyers Feed the Hungry”

Expert Media Commentary

Active Professional Leadership

Joseph Neuberger has acted as defence counsel in many notable criminal law cases. He is a published author and is often sought by local and national newspapers, television and radio for his insights and perspectives into criminal law. Mr. Neuberger is also a published author, public speaker, instructor and active participant in advancing the legal profession and criminal justice system.

Joseph Neuberger also authored “Assessing Dangerousness: Guide to the Dangerous Offender Application Process” and “Sexual Assault Law Update Newsletter”

Contact Us

Radio Appearances


Joseph Neuberger on the ON Point with Alex Pierson show

 


Joseph Neuberger on the Tasha Kheiriddin Show

 


Joseph Neuberger on the Greg Brady’s Morning Show

 


Joseph Neuberger On Scott Thompson Show

 


Joseph Neuberger On The John Oakley Show

 


Joseph Neuberger on The Exchange with Matt Gurney

 


Joseph Neuberger on the Kelly Cutrara Show

 


Joseph Neuberger on Bill Kelly Show

 

Joseph Neuberger on Jeff McArthur Show

Joseph Neuberger on Jeff McArthur Show

 


Joseph Neuberger on Stafford & Supriya Show

 

Nunc eget urna non ex viverraeget urna maximus.

Clients Testimonials

NrLawyers Blog

Why Do Judges Invent Imaginary Offenders to Test Real Laws?

July 15th, 2026

Why Do Judges Invent Imaginary Offenders to Test Real Laws? Joseph A. Neuberger, Michael P. Bury, and Diana Davison,...

Read More
How to Beat Sexual Assault Charges in Ontario Court

July 13th, 2026

Sexual assault charges in Ontario are among the most serious in the Criminal Code, but they are not uncontestable. The Crown...

Read More
What Is Sexual Assault Canadian Law: A Clear Guide

July 10th, 2026

Sexual assault under Canadian law is defined in the Criminal Code and covers a broad range of non-consensual sexual contact....

Read More
False Sexual Assault Allegations: How Defence Responds

July 6th, 2026

A false sexual assault allegation sets off a legal process that is immediate, serious, and unforgiving. From the moment a...

Read More

Contact Our Firm

Language Services Available


Our legal team provides multilingual service in Cantonese, Mandarin, French, Farsi, Italian, Russian, Ukrainian, Spanish, Hindi, and Punjabi.

Our legal team provides multilingual service in Cantonese, Mandarin, French, Farsi, Italian, Russian, Ukrainian, Spanish, Hindi, and Punjabi.

At Neuberger & Partners LLP, we value both your personal security and the security of the digital data you provide us with.
Our offices are protected by state of the art security systems which provide 24/7 protection to you and our staff when you visit us for in person meetings.
Our data and any digital evidence you provide us is protected behind robust firewall-protected servers. Additionally, our technology team provides offsite remote back-up for all digital files which can be accessed 24/7 in the event of an emergency.
All our data can also be safely accessed from any Courthouse by our lawyers with multiple layers of security and authentication requirements.